SULTAN SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
The State Government's refusal to make a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is an administrative order and does not require notice or hearing for the employer, even upon a second application; as no reference was actually made, appellant is not entitled to relief.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sultan Singh; Respondents: State of Haryana and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; no relief granted as no reference was made by the Government.
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Disputes Act Reference Procedure, Workman Reinstatement, Administrative Orders Vs. Quasi Judicial Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sultan Singh
Appellant
State of Haryana and Anr.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Dismissal of Writ Petition by Punjab & Haryana High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether State Government should hear employer before making a reference on second application under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
- 2 Whether an order of reference was made by the State Government entitling the appellant to adjudication by tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The State Government's refusal to make a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is an administrative order and does not require notice or hearing for the employer, even upon a second application; as no reference was actually made, appellant is not entitled to relief.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; no relief granted as no reference was made by the Government.
Orders
- Appeal disposed of accordingly.
- No costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment