SULTAN SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA
There was reliable evidence of cruelty and harassment for dowry by the appellant soon before the death of the deceased, who died of burns within seven years of marriage. The presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act rightly applied. The explanation of accidental death was rejected as not supported by facts or credible expert opinion. Conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC was upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sultan Singh; Respondent: State of Haryana
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dowry Death, Presumption Under Evidence Act, Cruelty by Husband, Appellate Review, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sultan Singh
Appellant
State of Haryana
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence of demand of dowry soon before the death was reliable
- 2 Whether the case was of accidental death as pleaded by the defence
- 3 Applicability of presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act
Ratio Decidendi
There was reliable evidence of cruelty and harassment for dowry by the appellant soon before the death of the deceased, who died of burns within seven years of marriage. The presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act rightly applied. The explanation of accidental death was rejected as not supported by facts or credible expert opinion. Conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC was upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appellant is directed to surrender to custody to undergo the remaining sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment