SULTAN SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

SULTAN SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

There was reliable evidence of cruelty and harassment for dowry by the appellant soon before the death of the deceased, who died of burns within seven years of marriage. The presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act rightly applied. The explanation of accidental death was rejected as not supported by facts or credible expert opinion. Conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC was upheld.

Parties
Appellant: Sultan Singh; Respondent: State of Haryana
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 September 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dowry Death, Presumption Under Evidence Act, Cruelty by Husband, Appellate Review, Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sultan Singh

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the evidence of demand of dowry soon before the death was reliable
  2. 2 Whether the case was of accidental death as pleaded by the defence
  3. 3 Applicability of presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act

Ratio Decidendi

There was reliable evidence of cruelty and harassment for dowry by the appellant soon before the death of the deceased, who died of burns within seven years of marriage. The presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act rightly applied. The explanation of accidental death was rejected as not supported by facts or credible expert opinion. Conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC was upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appellant is directed to surrender to custody to undergo the remaining sentence.