SUNDAR BABU AND ANR. versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU

The proceedings are manifestly attended with mala fide and instituted with an ulterior motive for vengeance due to private and personal grudge, as per category (7) of Bhajan Lal parameters. Therefore, the proceedings in petition pending before the Judicial Magistrate are quashed.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Appellant: Sundar Babu; Appellant: Venugopal; Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 19 February 2009
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Under S.482 Cr PC by High Court
Outcome: Appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Quashing of Proceedings, Abuse of Process of Law, Scope of Inherent Powers Under S.482 Cr PC, Dowry Prohibition, Cruelty to Wife Under S.498 a IPC

Criminal Law Quashing of Proceedings Abuse of Process of Law Scope of Inherent Powers Under S.482 Cr PC Dowry Prohibition Cruelty to Wife Under S.498 a IPC

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2

Parties

Sundar Babu

Appellant

Venugopal

Appellant

State of Tamil Nadu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Under S.482 Cr PC by High Court

Legal Issues

1 Whether criminal proceedings under s.498A IPC and s.4 of Dowry Prohibition Act should be quashed under s.482 CrPC
2 Scope and limits of inherent powers under s.482 CrPC for quashing proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

Proceedings in Criminal Petition No. C.C.No. 385/2000 before Judicial Magistrate, Palladam are quashed.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.