UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus SUNJL KUMAR GHOSH

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus SUNJL KUMAR GHOSH

Liability for compensation under Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 arises only if death or injury to a passenger results from an accident to the train or a part of it; mere injury to a passenger without such an accident does not attract the provision.

Parties
Petitioner: Union of India and Ors.; Respondent: Sunjl Kumar Ghosh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 August 1984
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; High Court's view on law held to be erroneous but operative order not interfered with due to low amount in dispute.
Legal Topics
Railway Accidents, Statutory Liability, Interpretation of 'accident', Compensation for Injury/death, Scope of Section 82 a, Indian Railways Act 1890
Tort Law Railway Law Railway Accidents Statutory Liability Interpretation of 'accident' Compensation for Injury/death Scope of Section 82 A, Indian Railways Act 1890

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Union of India and Ors.

Petitioner

Sunjl Kumar Ghosh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal From High Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 imposes liability for compensation for injury when there has not been an 'accident to the train' but only to the passenger.
  2. 2 What is the meaning of 'accident' under Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890.

Ratio Decidendi

Liability for compensation under Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 arises only if death or injury to a passenger results from an accident to the train or a part of it; mere injury to a passenger without such an accident does not attract the provision.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; High Court's view on law held to be erroneous but operative order not interfered with due to low amount in dispute.

Orders

  • No interference with High Court's operative order given the size of the award; however, Supreme Court clarifies the correct interpretation of Section 82A, Indian Railways Act, 1890.