SHRI K. JAYARAM & ORS. versus BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

SHRI K. JAYARAM & ORS. versus BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS.

The appellants were non-suited because they suppressed material prior civil proceedings and their dismissals, thereby abusing the process and failing the clean hands requirement for equitable writ relief; additionally, on merits the records establish that the entire Survey No.13 (including kharab-B portions) was notified and possession taken, so no compensation was payable in respect of the 8 guntas alleged to be left out and the High Court's conclusions are final and binding.

Parties
Appellants: Shri K. Jayaram & Ors.; Respondents: Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
08 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Judgment and Review Petition Dismissal
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Suppression of Material Facts, Clean Hands Doctrine, Abuse of Process, Res Judicata, Kharab B Land Compensation, Article 226
Land Acquisition Writ Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Equity Suppression of Material Facts Clean Hands Doctrine Abuse of Process Res Judicata +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shri K. Jayaram & Ors.

Appellants

Bangalore Development Authority & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Against High Court Judgment and Review Petition Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether appellants suppressed prior civil proceedings and their dismissal amounting to abuse of process and precluding equitable writ relief
  2. 2 Whether the relevant land (Survey No.13) including portions described as kharab-B was validly acquired by BDA and whether compensation was payable for the 8 guntas alleged to have been left out
  3. 3 Whether the High Court's findings in the earlier civil proceedings and appeal are binding and preclude the writ challenge

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants were non-suited because they suppressed material prior civil proceedings and their dismissals, thereby abusing the process and failing the clean hands requirement for equitable writ relief; additionally, on merits the records establish that the entire Survey No.13 (including kharab-B portions) was notified and possession taken, so no compensation was payable in respect of the 8 guntas alleged to be left out and the High Court's conclusions are final and binding.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed
  • Pending applications, if any, disposed of