SURAJ PARKASH GUPTA AND OTHERS versus STATE OF J & K AND OTHERS

SURAJ PARKASH GUPTA AND OTHERS versus STATE OF J & K AND OTHERS

Regularisation of ad-hoc promotions by implied relaxation was invalid as it violated the quota rule and was done without consulting the Public Service Commission. Ad-hoc/stop gap service can be regularised for seniority only within the promotee quota and from date of vacancy, subject to eligibility; service outside quota cannot count. Direct recruits' seniority can only be from the date of substantive appointment. Quota rule had not broken down and no evidence was provided to justify the relaxation.

Parties
Appellant: Suraj Parkash Gupta; Respondent: State of Jammu & Kashmir
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeals / Final Decision
Outcome
appeals disposed
Legal Topics
Regularisation, Seniority, Quota Rule, Recruitment Rules, Relaxation of Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 27 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suraj Parkash Gupta

Appellant

State of Jammu & Kashmir

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeals / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether wholesale regularisation of ad-hoc promotee Assistant Engineers by implied relaxation of recruitment rules is valid without following quota and consultation with Public Service Commission
  2. 2 Whether ad-hoc/stop gap service beyond six months without consultation can be regularised and count for seniority
  3. 3 Whether direct recruits can claim seniority from a date prior to their appointment

Ratio Decidendi

Regularisation of ad-hoc promotions by implied relaxation was invalid as it violated the quota rule and was done without consulting the Public Service Commission. Ad-hoc/stop gap service can be regularised for seniority only within the promotee quota and from date of vacancy, subject to eligibility; service outside quota cannot count. Direct recruits' seniority can only be from the date of substantive appointment. Quota rule had not broken down and no evidence was provided to justify the relaxation.

Court Disposition

appeals disposed

Orders

  • Public Service Commission and Government to complete regular appointments within four months.
  • Stay of promotions granted by Supreme Court to operate until provisional seniority lists are prepared.