SURENDER SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

SURENDER SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

Despite witnesses turning hostile and minor discrepancies, the testimony of the injured witness, corroborated by medical evidence and partial recovery of stolen property, sufficiently establishes the prosecution case, justifying the conviction. No interference with concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts is warranted under Article 136.

Parties
Appellant: Surender Singh; Appellant: Vikas; Respondent: State of Haryana
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal, Special Leave Petition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentences maintained.
Legal Topics
Robbery, Use of Arms, Witness Hostility, Credibility of Injured Witness, Minor Discrepancies in Evidence
Criminal Law Robbery Use of Arms Witness Hostility Credibility of Injured Witness Minor Discrepancies in Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Surender Singh

Appellant

Vikas

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal, Special Leave Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether conviction justified when key witnesses turned hostile and discrepancies are present
  2. 2 Evidentiary effect of injured witness testimony
  3. 3 Impact of partial recovery of stolen property

Ratio Decidendi

Despite witnesses turning hostile and minor discrepancies, the testimony of the injured witness, corroborated by medical evidence and partial recovery of stolen property, sufficiently establishes the prosecution case, justifying the conviction. No interference with concurrent findings of fact by the lower courts is warranted under Article 136.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentences maintained.

Orders

  • Appeals devoid of merits and accordingly dismissed.
  • All sentences to run concurrently.