SURENDRA NATH KHOSLA versus DALIP SINGH

SURENDRA NATH KHOSLA versus DALIP SINGH

Improper rejection of a nomination paper by a Returning Officer creates a presumption that the result of the election has been materially affected, especially in a double member constituency, making the whole election void. Attestation of thumb impressions by a magistrate specified by the Election Commission is valid, even if communication errors occur locally.

Parties
Appellant: Surendra Nath Khosla; Appellant: Pritam Singh; Respondent: Dalip Singh; Respondent: Naunit Lal; Respondent: Buta Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
29 November 1956
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Election Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Improper Rejection of Nomination Paper, Double Member Constituency, Presumption as to Result Being Materially Affected, Attestation of Thumb Impression, Representation of the People Act, 1951
Election Law Improper Rejection of Nomination Paper Double Member Constituency Presumption as to Result Being Materially Affected Attestation of Thumb Impression Representation of the People Act, 1951

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Surendra Nath Khosla

Appellant

Pritam Singh

Appellant

Dalip Singh

Respondent

Naunit Lal

Respondent

Buta Singh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Election Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether improper rejection of nomination paper materially affected the result of the election
  2. 2 Whether attestation of thumb impressions was proper
  3. 3 Whether whole election is void in a double member constituency

Ratio Decidendi

Improper rejection of a nomination paper by a Returning Officer creates a presumption that the result of the election has been materially affected, especially in a double member constituency, making the whole election void. Attestation of thumb impressions by a magistrate specified by the Election Commission is valid, even if communication errors occur locally.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Election void as a whole
  • Costs to contesting respondents