SURENDRA SINGH & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

SURENDRA SINGH & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

All circumstances forming the chain of events—motive, last seen, recovery and identification of stolen articles, discovery of weapon, clothes containing blood, and discovery of lock/key—were proved beyond reasonable doubt, and pointed to guilt and complicity of appellants; no perversity or illegality found in the concurrent findings of courts below.

Parties
Appellant: Surendra Singh; Appellant: Ram Singh; Respondent: State of Uttarakhand
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 December 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Circumstantial Evidence, Murder, Burglary, Theft, Appellate Review, Article 136 Constitution of India

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Surendra Singh

Appellant

Ram Singh

Appellant

State of Uttarakhand

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the conviction of the appellants based on circumstantial evidence was sustainable
  2. 2 Whether the chain of events connecting the accused to the crime was established
  3. 3 Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt

Ratio Decidendi

All circumstances forming the chain of events—motive, last seen, recovery and identification of stolen articles, discovery of weapon, clothes containing blood, and discovery of lock/key—were proved beyond reasonable doubt, and pointed to guilt and complicity of appellants; no perversity or illegality found in the concurrent findings of courts below.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction and sentence confirmed
  • Appeal abated as against deceased accused (A-1)