SURENDRA SINGH & ANR. versus STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
All circumstances forming the chain of events—motive, last seen, recovery and identification of stolen articles, discovery of weapon, clothes containing blood, and discovery of lock/key—were proved beyond reasonable doubt, and pointed to guilt and complicity of appellants; no perversity or illegality found in the concurrent findings of courts below.
- Parties
- Appellant: Surendra Singh; Appellant: Ram Singh; Respondent: State of Uttarakhand
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Circumstantial Evidence, Murder, Burglary, Theft, Appellate Review, Article 136 Constitution of India
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Surendra Singh
Appellant
Ram Singh
Appellant
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of the appellants based on circumstantial evidence was sustainable
- 2 Whether the chain of events connecting the accused to the crime was established
- 3 Whether the prosecution proved the case beyond reasonable doubt
Ratio Decidendi
All circumstances forming the chain of events—motive, last seen, recovery and identification of stolen articles, discovery of weapon, clothes containing blood, and discovery of lock/key—were proved beyond reasonable doubt, and pointed to guilt and complicity of appellants; no perversity or illegality found in the concurrent findings of courts below.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction and sentence confirmed
- Appeal abated as against deceased accused (A-1)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment