SURESH CHANDRA PODDAR versus DHANI RAM AND ORS.
Delay in implementing tribunal's order, accompanied by steps to challenge it legally and eventual compliance, does not justify conviction for contempt; contempt jurisdiction should not be exercised routinely or over-sensitively, and apology from contemner should generally be accepted if accompanied by compliance and genuine contrition.
- Parties
- Appellant: Suresh Chandra Poddar; Respondents: Dhani Ram and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal Order
- Outcome
- Order of Tribunal set aside; appellant exonerated from contempt.
- Legal Topics
- Exercise of Contempt Jurisdiction, Compliance With Tribunal Orders, Apology in Contempt Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Suresh Chandra Poddar
Appellant
Dhani Ram and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central Administrative Tribunal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in implementing tribunal's order constitutes contempt of court
- 2 Appropriate exercise of contempt jurisdiction by tribunals
Ratio Decidendi
Delay in implementing tribunal's order, accompanied by steps to challenge it legally and eventual compliance, does not justify conviction for contempt; contempt jurisdiction should not be exercised routinely or over-sensitively, and apology from contemner should generally be accepted if accompanied by compliance and genuine contrition.
Court Disposition
Order of Tribunal set aside; appellant exonerated from contempt.
Orders
- Impugned order of Tribunal set aside
- Appellant exonerated totally from contempt of court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment