SURINDER SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

SURINDER SINGH versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Selection based on marks obtained in Matriculation (preferential qualification) was valid as per departmental guidelines. CAT and High Court erred in not applying the correct interpretation; it is within employer's authority to prescribe criteria, and no preference should be given above Matriculation.

Parties
Appellant: Surinder Singh; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Department of Posts; Respondent: Dharam Pal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Selection Procedure, Preferential Qualification, Appointment Validity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Surinder Singh

Appellant

Union of India

Respondent

Department of Posts

Respondent

Dharam Pal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether selection and appointment based on preferential qualification (Matriculation) is valid for EDDA post as per departmental guidelines
  2. 2 Whether CAT and High Court correctly interpreted and applied the guidelines for EDDA selection

Ratio Decidendi

Selection based on marks obtained in Matriculation (preferential qualification) was valid as per departmental guidelines. CAT and High Court erred in not applying the correct interpretation; it is within employer's authority to prescribe criteria, and no preference should be given above Matriculation.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment and order dated 27.09.2000 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana and order of CAT quashed and set aside.
  • Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 directed to facilitate resumption of duties by appellant as EDDA.