SUSHIL ANSAL versus STATE THROUGH CBI
Convicted owners sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment for offences under Section 304A read with Section 36 and Sections 337 and 338 read with Section 36 IPC; sentence reduced to period already undergone if they pay Rs.30 crores each within three months, given advanced age and circumstances.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sushil Ansal; Respondent: State through CBI
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Disposition Following Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of with directions
- Legal Topics
- Sentence/sentencing, Negligence, Section 304 a IPC, Section 36 IPC, Section 337 IPC, Section 338 IPC
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sushil Ansal
Appellant
State through CBI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Disposition Following Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Sentencing of cinema owners convicted for negligence resulting in deaths
- 2 Appropriateness of reduction of sentence on payment of compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Convicted owners sentenced to two years rigorous imprisonment for offences under Section 304A read with Section 36 and Sections 337 and 338 read with Section 36 IPC; sentence reduced to period already undergone if they pay Rs.30 crores each within three months, given advanced age and circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of with directions
Orders
- A-1 Sushil Ansal and A-2 Gopal Ansal sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years; if they pay Rs.30 crores each within three months, sentence stands reduced to period already undergone
- Failing payment, they shall undergo the sentence of two years each, excluding the term already undergone
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment