SUVARNALATA versus MOHAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH & ANR.

SUVARNALATA versus MOHAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH & ANR.

Findings regarding appellant's alleged mental disorder are not sustainable; prayer for permanent alimony under Section 25 is justified; matter remitted for determination of respondent's income before fixing quantum of alimony.

Parties
Appellant: Suvarnalata; Respondent: Mohan Anandrao Deshmukh; Child: Naveli
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 April 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Pending Before Supreme Court; Records Remitted to Family Court for Additional Evidence
Outcome
Appeal adjourned and kept pending; delay condoned; matter remitted to Family Court to ascertain estimated income of respondent for final order on quantum of alimony
Legal Topics
Divorce, Permanent Alimony, Mental Disorder

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suvarnalata

Appellant

Mohan Anandrao Deshmukh

Respondent

Naveli

Child

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Pending Before Supreme Court; Records Remitted to Family Court for Additional Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the findings relating to appellant's alleged mental disorder/schizophrenia are sustainable
  2. 2 Whether the claim for permanent alimony under Section 25 of Hindu Marriage Act is maintainable and justified

Ratio Decidendi

Findings regarding appellant's alleged mental disorder are not sustainable; prayer for permanent alimony under Section 25 is justified; matter remitted for determination of respondent's income before fixing quantum of alimony.

Court Disposition

Appeal adjourned and kept pending; delay condoned; matter remitted to Family Court to ascertain estimated income of respondent for final order on quantum of alimony

Orders

  • Records remitted to Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad to take additional evidence on estimated income of Respondent No.1 within two months
  • Parties directed to appear before Family Court on 26th April, 2010