TARA SINGH versus THE STATE
Conviction and sentence are set aside due to gross disregard of section 342 and improper admission of committal court evidence under section 288 without compliance with section 145 of the Evidence Act; there is grave likelihood of prejudice, requiring retrial de novo.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tara Singh; Respondent: The State
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1951
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Under Article 136(1) of the Constitution
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence set aside; retrial de novo ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Murder Trial, Procedure for Police Reports (challan), Examination of Accused Under Section 342, Admissibility of Statements Under Evidence Act, Retrial Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tara Singh
Appellant
The State
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Supreme Court Under Article 136(1) of the Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether filing a second challan vitiates proceedings based on the first report under section 173(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code
- 2 Whether the accused was denied opportunity to be represented by counsel under section 340(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code
- 3 Whether section 342 was properly complied with at the committal stage
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction and sentence are set aside due to gross disregard of section 342 and improper admission of committal court evidence under section 288 without compliance with section 145 of the Evidence Act; there is grave likelihood of prejudice, requiring retrial de novo.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence set aside; retrial de novo ordered.
Orders
- Retrial de novo in Sessions Court either by same or other Sessions Judge.
- Committal treated as good.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment