TARIQ ISLAM versus ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

TARIQ ISLAM versus ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

The appellant's B.A.(Hons.) degree from a foreign university was recognized as equivalent to an Indian master's degree by the University for the purpose of admission to M.Phil and Ph.D. courses, and therefore, the appellant possessed the required qualifications for the post of Lecturer. The University and Academic Council's established recognition of this equivalence cannot be retrospectively nullified, and such decisions about equivalence are academic matters best left to academic authorities.

Parties
Appellant: Tariq Islam; Respondents: Aligarh Muslim University and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
09 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 20.4.2000 of the Allahabad High Court in C.w.p. No. 19024 of 1999
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside.
Legal Topics
Appointment of Lecturer, Equivalence of Foreign Degrees, Academic Qualification Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tariq Islam

Appellant

Aligarh Muslim University and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 20.4.2000 of the Allahabad High Court in C.w.p. No. 19024 of 1999

  1. 1 Whether B.A.(Hons.) degree from a foreign university is equivalent to a master's degree from an Indian university for the post of lecturer.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant possessed the minimum academic qualifications required for appointment as Lecturer.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's B.A.(Hons.) degree from a foreign university was recognized as equivalent to an Indian master's degree by the University for the purpose of admission to M.Phil and Ph.D. courses, and therefore, the appellant possessed the required qualifications for the post of Lecturer. The University and Academic Council's established recognition of this equivalence cannot be retrospectively nullified, and such decisions about equivalence are academic matters best left to academic authorities.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside.

Orders

  • Respondents to give effect to the Vice Chancellor's order dated November 29, 2000 with all consequential benefits to the appellant.
  • University to accommodate respondent No.7 in an appropriate post as well.