TATA MOTORS LTD. versus TALATHI OF VILLAGE CHIKHALI AND ORS.
The appellant is not a 'government lessee' as the Development Authority is not the government or its agent in respect of the leased land; statutory Regulations and the lease deed create direct liability on the appellant as lessee to pay non-agricultural assessment to the state government, justifying the direct demand upon it.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tata Motors Ltd.; Respondents: Talathi of Village Chikhali and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Non Agricultural Cess Liability, Government Lessee Definition, Liability of Tenants Under Land Revenue Law, Statutory Regulations Under Regional Planning Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tata Motors Ltd.
Appellant
Talathi of Village Chikhali and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was a 'government lessee' and not liable to pay non-agricultural assessment under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
- 2 Whether non-agricultural assessment liability could be imposed directly on the appellant as a tenant of the Development Authority rather than on the Development Authority itself.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant is not a 'government lessee' as the Development Authority is not the government or its agent in respect of the leased land; statutory Regulations and the lease deed create direct liability on the appellant as lessee to pay non-agricultural assessment to the state government, justifying the direct demand upon it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Appellant at liberty to file objections/representations before Revenue Authority regarding quantum of non-agricultural assessment.
- Arrears/dues to be paid with interest at 9% per annum from 26.2.2002.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment