THAKUR BRIJ RAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER versus THAKUR LAXMAN SINGH AND ANOTHER
Under the Ajmer Land and Revenue Regulation, 1877, s. 23, confirmation of adoption by the Central Government is essential for a valid adoption by a widow in respect of an istimrari estate, but such confirmation does not validate an adoption that is otherwise invalid under general law. The jurisdiction of civil courts to adjudicate upon the factum and validity of the adoption is not excluded by sections 23 and 119 of the Regulation. Suits seeking a declaration as to the invalidity of the adoption are not barred.
- Parties
- Appellant: Thakur Brij Raj Singh; Respondent: Thakur Laxman Singh; Defendant: Rani Bagheliji of Sawar; Defendant: Inder Singh of Rudh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 1960
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, Ajmer
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (majority), suit maintainable; dissenting opinion would allow appeal and hold suit barred
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Suit, Istimrari Estate, Adoption by Widow, Confirmation of Adoption by Central Government, Bar of Civil Suit, Interpretation of Ajmer Land and Revenue Regulation, 1877, Ss. 23, 24, 119
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thakur Brij Raj Singh
Appellant
Thakur Laxman Singh
Respondent
Rani Bagheliji of Sawar
Defendant
Inder Singh of Rudh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Judgment and Decree of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, Ajmer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether after confirmation of adoption by the Central Government under s. 23 of the Ajmer Land and Revenue Regulation, 1877, the factum and validity of the adoption can be challenged in civil court
- 2 Whether ss. 23 and 119 of the Regulation bar a civil suit for a declaration regarding adoption and succession to istimrari estate
Ratio Decidendi
Under the Ajmer Land and Revenue Regulation, 1877, s. 23, confirmation of adoption by the Central Government is essential for a valid adoption by a widow in respect of an istimrari estate, but such confirmation does not validate an adoption that is otherwise invalid under general law. The jurisdiction of civil courts to adjudicate upon the factum and validity of the adoption is not excluded by sections 23 and 119 of the Regulation. Suits seeking a declaration as to the invalidity of the adoption are not barred.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (majority), suit maintainable; dissenting opinion would allow appeal and hold suit barred
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment