AJIT KUMAR KAVLRAJ versus THE DISTT. MAGISTRATE, BIRBHUM AND ANR.

AJIT KUMAR KAVLRAJ versus THE DISTT. MAGISTRATE, BIRBHUM AND ANR.

There was a clear violation of Article 22(5) as the grounds of detention were vague and uncertain, affording the petitioner no adequate opportunity to make an effective representation; procedural safeguards of liberty must be strictly observed and the detaining authority must apply its mind properly when passing...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: Ajit Kumar Kaviraj; Respondent: The Distt. Magistrate, Birbhum and Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
06 September 1974
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Original Jurisdiction; Supreme Court Review of Preventive Detention Order
Outcome
Petition allowed; detention order quashed.
Legal Topics
Article 32, Article 22(5), Preventive Detention, Procedural Safeguards, Clarity of Detention Grounds
Constitutional Law Preventive Detention Article 32 Article 22(5) Procedural Safeguards Clarity of Detention Grounds

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ajit Kumar Kaviraj

Petitioner

The Distt. Magistrate, Birbhum and Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Original Jurisdiction; Supreme Court Review of Preventive Detention Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the grounds of detention communicated to the detenu were vague and uncertain in violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India, thereby depriving him of the opportunity to make an effective representation against the detention order

Ratio Decidendi

There was a clear violation of Article 22(5) as the grounds of detention were vague and uncertain, affording the petitioner no adequate opportunity to make an effective representation; procedural safeguards of liberty must be strictly observed and the detaining authority must apply its mind properly when passing orders.

Court Disposition

Petition allowed; detention order quashed.

Orders

  • The rule is made absolute. The petitioner shall be released from detention forthwith.