THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD versus RAMESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.
The High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition against a statutory show cause notice issued by the competent authority under Section 59 of the Bihar State Housing Board Act, 1982, especially where basic facts regarding ownership and tenancy were in dispute and there was no challenge to the vires of the provisions or any infringement of fundamental rights. The proper course was for the respondent to reply to the show cause notice and pursue available remedies under the Act before approaching the writ court.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board; First Respondent: Ramesh Kumar Singh; Second Respondent: State of Bihar; Third Respondent: Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Saraikella, District Singhbhum (East); Fourth Respondent: Sri S.N. Pandey
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court's Decision in CWJC No. 82/93
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Scope of Article 226, Eviction From Government/board Housing, Jurisdiction of Statutory Authorities, Alternative Remedies and Writ Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Executive Engineer, Bihar State Housing Board
Appellant
Ramesh Kumar Singh
First Respondent
State of Bihar
Second Respondent
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Saraikella, District Singhbhum (East)
Third Respondent
Sri S.N. Pandey
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Patna High Court's Decision in CWJC No. 82/93
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable to quash a show cause notice for eviction issued under Section 59 of the Bihar State Housing Board Act, 1982, without first availing the alternative remedy.
- 2 Whether the competent authority under the Act has jurisdiction to issue notice and initiate eviction proceedings when the basic facts (ownership/tenancy) are disputed.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court erred in entertaining a writ petition against a statutory show cause notice issued by the competent authority under Section 59 of the Bihar State Housing Board Act, 1982, especially where basic facts regarding ownership and tenancy were in dispute and there was no challenge to the vires of the provisions or any infringement of fundamental rights. The proper course was for the respondent to reply to the show cause notice and pursue available remedies under the Act before approaching the writ court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the Patna High Court in CWJC No. 82/93 dated 10.2.1993 set aside
- Show cause notice (Annexure Ext. P-4) and eviction proceedings No. 6/92 restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment