THE LORD KRISHNA TEXTILE MILLS versus ITS WORKMEN
The Tribunal erred in assuming the powers of an appellate authority, reviewing the adequacy of evidence and findings of fact, rather than limiting itself to statutory questions under Section 33(2)(b); as all statutory conditions were satisfied, approval to the dismissals should have been granted.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Lord Krishna Textile Mills; Respondent: Its Workmen
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1960
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Award of Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Misconduct, Approval of Dismissal During Industrial Dispute, Scope of Tribunal's Jurisdiction Under Industrial Disputes Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Lord Krishna Textile Mills
Appellant
Its Workmen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Award of Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in refusing approval to the dismissal of workmen by assuming powers of an appellate court under Section 6E(2)(b) of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (or Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947) for acts of misconduct not connected with a pending dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in assuming the powers of an appellate authority, reviewing the adequacy of evidence and findings of fact, rather than limiting itself to statutory questions under Section 33(2)(b); as all statutory conditions were satisfied, approval to the dismissals should have been granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Tribunal set aside
- Approval is accorded to the action taken by the appellant under s. 6E
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment