M/S. A.B.N.A. AND ORS. versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. U.P.S.I.D.C. LIMITED, KANPUR & ANR.
The MRTP Commission's order dated 13.09.2007 was an interim order and not a consent order; as such, the Commission had the power under Section 13(2) to recall or modify it at any time and the review application was not barred by limitation.
- Parties
- Petitioner: M/S. A.B.N.A. AND ORS.; Respondent: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. U.P.S.I.D.C. LIMITED, KANPUR & ANR.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- SLP (civil) Nos. 16116 16117 of 2010 / Special Leave Petition Dismissed
- Outcome
- Special Leave Petitions dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Review of Interim Orders, Allotment of Industrial Plot, Jurisdiction of MRTP Commission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. A.B.N.A. AND ORS.
Petitioner
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. U.P.S.I.D.C. LIMITED, KANPUR & ANR.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
SLP (civil) Nos. 16116 16117 of 2010 / Special Leave Petition Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the MRTP Commission's 13.09.2007 order was a consent order and could be recalled.
- 2 Whether review application was barred by limitation under Section 13(2) of the MRTP Act.
- 3 Whether the MRTP Commission has jurisdiction to direct handover of possession of the allotted plot.
Ratio Decidendi
The MRTP Commission's order dated 13.09.2007 was an interim order and not a consent order; as such, the Commission had the power under Section 13(2) to recall or modify it at any time and the review application was not barred by limitation.
Court Disposition
Special Leave Petitions dismissed.
Orders
- Special leave to appeal declined.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment