THE PRINTERS (MYSORE) PRIVATE LTD. versus POTHAN JOSEPH
Since both the trial court and the High Court exercised their discretion, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, in refusing to stay the proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, and since no manifestly unreasonable or perverse exercise of discretion was shown, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the concurrent findings in exercise of its powers under Article 136.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd.; Respondent: Pothan Joseph
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 1960
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Mysore High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Suit Under Arbitration Agreement, Discretionary Power of Court, Scope of Interference Under Article 136
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd.
Appellant
Pothan Joseph
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment and Order of Mysore High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the courts below erred in refusing to stay the suit under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, in view of the arbitration agreement between the parties
Ratio Decidendi
Since both the trial court and the High Court exercised their discretion, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, in refusing to stay the proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, and since no manifestly unreasonable or perverse exercise of discretion was shown, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the concurrent findings in exercise of its powers under Article 136.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs throughout
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment