BUDHAN CHOUDHRY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

BUDHAN CHOUDHRY AND OTHERS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR

Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not offend Article 14 of the Constitution as it establishes an additional court for specified offences and regions based on reasonable geographic and procedural classification, which applies equally to all similarly situated accused without arbitrary discrimination. Judicial discretion and procedural safeguards prevent capricious application.

Parties
Appellants: Budhan Choudhry and Others; Respondent: The State of Bihar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 December 1954
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Under Article 132(1) of the Constitution of India / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25th August 1953 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 410 of 1951
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 14 – Equality Before Law, Section 30 – Code of Criminal Procedure, Reasonable Classification, Procedural Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Budhan Choudhry and Others

Appellants

The State of Bihar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Under Article 132(1) of the Constitution of India / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 25th August 1953 of the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 410 of 1951

  1. 1 Whether section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India on the ground of procedural discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not offend Article 14 of the Constitution as it establishes an additional court for specified offences and regions based on reasonable geographic and procedural classification, which applies equally to all similarly situated accused without arbitrary discrimination. Judicial discretion and procedural safeguards prevent capricious application.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Decision of the High Court is confirmed; appeal dismissed without costs.