BOKARO AND RAMGUR LTD. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER
A claim under Article 32 alleging infringement of fundamental right to property can only arise after the petitioner's title is established; where the title itself is in dispute and under statutory adjudication, fundamental rights are not immediately invocable until such determination is made.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Bokaro and Ramgur Ltd.; Respondent: The State of Bihar and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Fundamental Rights, Right to Property, Writ Jurisdiction, Title Adjudication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bokaro and Ramgur Ltd.
Petitioner
The State of Bihar and Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner can claim infringement of fundamental right to property under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) when title to the property is itself the subject of adjudication under legally constituted proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A claim under Article 32 alleging infringement of fundamental right to property can only arise after the petitioner's title is established; where the title itself is in dispute and under statutory adjudication, fundamental rights are not immediately invocable until such determination is made.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The writ petition is dismissed as misconceived as it does not involve any question of infringement of fundamental right.
- Petitioner to pay costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment