– CITIZENSHIP STATUS versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Rule 5A(3), which restricted the number of candidates called for the final written examination to 10% of those who appeared, is arbitrary and violates Supreme Court directions in Malik Mazhar Sultan, and is therefore struck down. For present exam, not prescribing minimum passing marks in the preliminary test does...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Rahul Dutta & Ors.; Respondent: The State of Bihar & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Rule 5A(3) struck down; writ petitions allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Recruitment, Reservation Policy, Arbitrariness in Rules
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rahul Dutta & Ors.
Petitioner
The State of Bihar & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 5A(3) of the Bihar Civil Service (Judicial Branch) (Recruitment) Rules, 1955, restricting candidates for final written examination to 10% of appeared candidates, is constitutionally valid
- 2 Whether fixation of minimum passing marks in the preliminary examination is necessary
- 3 Compliance with ratio 1:10 for calling candidates for final examination as directed in Malik Mazhar Sultan case
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 5A(3), which restricted the number of candidates called for the final written examination to 10% of those who appeared, is arbitrary and violates Supreme Court directions in Malik Mazhar Sultan, and is therefore struck down. For present exam, not prescribing minimum passing marks in the preliminary test does not render the process invalid, but must be fixed for future exams.
Court Disposition
Rule 5A(3) struck down; writ petitions allowed
Orders
- Rule 5A(3) of the Bihar Civil Service (Judicial Branch) (Recruitment) Rules, 1955 is struck down
- Final written examination date extended; must be held within six weeks from 14.2.2019
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment