THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, AYURVEDIC AND UNANI TIBIA COLLEGE, DELHI versus THE STATE OF DELHI AND ANOTHER
The Delhi State Legislature was competent to enact the Tibbia College Act, 1952. The old Board was not a corporation within Entry 44, List I, but an unincorporated society. The impugned Act, dissolving the Board and incorporating a new Board for purposes limited to Delhi, fell within legislative competence under Entry 32 List II and Entries 10 and 28 List III. The Act did not violate Articles 14, 19, or 31, nor was there conflict with the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The petitioners' claims of mala fides were unfounded.
- Parties
- Petitioner: The Board of Trustees, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibia College, Delhi; Petitioner: Hakim Mohammad Jamil Khan; Respondent: The State of Delhi; Respondent: Tibbia College Board (new Board constituted under the Act)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1961
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (article 32) / Supreme Court of India, Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Validity of State Legislation, Fundamental Rights, Registered Societies, Corporate Status and Dissolution, Legislative Competence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Board of Trustees, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibia College, Delhi
Petitioner
Hakim Mohammad Jamil Khan
Petitioner
The State of Delhi
Respondent
Tibbia College Board (new Board constituted under the Act)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (article 32) / Supreme Court of India, Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Delhi State Legislature was competent to dissolve the petitioner Board and set up a new corporation under the Tibbia College Act, 1952.
- 2 Whether the impugned Act violated Arts. 14, 19 and 31 of the Constitution of India.
- 3 Whether the Act could override the Societies Registration Act, 1860, a Central Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Delhi State Legislature was competent to enact the Tibbia College Act, 1952. The old Board was not a corporation within Entry 44, List I, but an unincorporated society. The impugned Act, dissolving the Board and incorporating a new Board for purposes limited to Delhi, fell within legislative competence under Entry 32 List II and Entries 10 and 28 List III. The Act did not violate Articles 14, 19, or 31, nor was there conflict with the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The petitioners' claims of mala fides were unfounded.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- The petition is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment