ANANDA BEHERA AND ANOTHER versus THE STATE OF ORISSA AND ANOTHER
Fishery rights acquired by oral license constitute a profit a prendre, which is immovable property; sales above Rs 100 not executed by written and registered instrument do not transfer title or interest. The State's refusal to recognize such interests does not infringe fundamental rights as there is no confiscation or acquisition by the State.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ananda Behera and another; Respondent: The State of Orissa and another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 1955
- Procedural Posture
- Original Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fundamental Rights, Profit a Prendre, Transfer of Property, Registration of Immovable Property, Estate Abolition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ananda Behera and another
Petitioner
The State of Orissa and another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Original Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether oral sale of fishery rights prior to estate vesting creates enforceable property/fundamental rights under the Constitution.
- 2 Whether rights acquired are in respect of movable or immovable property and require registration.
- 3 Whether non-recognition by the State transgresses Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
Fishery rights acquired by oral license constitute a profit a prendre, which is immovable property; sales above Rs 100 not executed by written and registered instrument do not transfer title or interest. The State's refusal to recognize such interests does not infringe fundamental rights as there is no confiscation or acquisition by the State.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment