RAMYASH @ LAL BAHADUR versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER ETC. ETC
The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 362 Cr.P.C. by materially altering its earlier signed judgment and final order (dated 21 May 2018) beyond correcting a clerical or arithmetical error; conversion of convictions from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC was not a permissible clerical correction and the impugned correction order dated 8 February 2019 was quashed and set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant/complainant: Ramyash @ Lal Bahadur; Respondent: The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Correction Application Under Section 362 Cr.p.c.
- Outcome
- Criminal Appeal Nos.1153-1155 of 2021 allowed; Criminal Appeal No.1175 of 2021 dismissed; impugned High Court judgment and order dated 8 February 2019 quashed and set aside in part.
- Legal Topics
- Section 362 Cr PC, Correction Application, Clerical or Arithmetical Error, Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Conversion to Section 304 Part II IPC, Review of Judgment, Sentence Reduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramyash @ Lal Bahadur
Appellant/complainant
The State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the Supreme Court Against High Court Order on Correction Application Under Section 362 Cr.p.c.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in allowing a Correction Application under Section 362 Cr.P.C. to modify its earlier judgment and convert convictions under Section 302 IPC into convictions under Section 304 Part II IPC
- 2 Whether the modification effected by the High Court amounted to alteration/review of a signed judgment beyond correcting a clerical or arithmetical error
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 362 Cr.P.C. by materially altering its earlier signed judgment and final order (dated 21 May 2018) beyond correcting a clerical or arithmetical error; conversion of convictions from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part II IPC was not a permissible clerical correction and the impugned correction order dated 8 February 2019 was quashed and set aside.
Court Disposition
Criminal Appeal Nos.1153-1155 of 2021 allowed; Criminal Appeal No.1175 of 2021 dismissed; impugned High Court judgment and order dated 8 February 2019 quashed and set aside in part.
Orders
- Criminal Appeal Nos.1153-1155 of 2021 are allowed
- Criminal Appeal No.1175 of 2021 is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment