THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus MADAN MOHAN NAGAR

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH versus MADAN MOHAN NAGAR

An order of compulsory retirement that expressly states the officer has outlived his utility attaches a stigma and amounts to punishment or dismissal, not a mere retirement; therefore, it is invalid if passed without compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: The State of Uttar Pradesh; Respondent: Madan Mohan Nagar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 January 1967
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of Allahabad High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Compulsory Retirement, Stigma in Service Termination, Article 311 of the Constitution, Principles of Natural Justice
Service Law Constitutional Law Compulsory Retirement Stigma in Service Termination Article 311 of the Constitution Principles of Natural Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State of Uttar Pradesh

Appellant

Madan Mohan Nagar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of Allahabad High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an order of compulsory retirement that states the officer has 'outlived his utility' casts a stigma and amounts to punishment or dismissal
  2. 2 Whether the compulsory retirement order under Article 465A of the U.P. Civil Service Regulation violated Article 311 of the Constitution

Ratio Decidendi

An order of compulsory retirement that expressly states the officer has outlived his utility attaches a stigma and amounts to punishment or dismissal, not a mere retirement; therefore, it is invalid if passed without compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal is dismissed with costs.