PUSHKAR MUKHERJEE & ORS. versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

PUSHKAR MUKHERJEE & ORS. versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Detention orders based on grounds relating only to assaults on solitary individuals or vague grounds not connected with public order are illegal and ultra vires. The constitutional safeguard against vagueness must be satisfied for each ground supplied; if any ground is vague or irrelevant, the detention is invalid.

Parties
Petitioner: Pushkar Mukherjee & Ors.; Respondent: The State of West Bengal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 November 1968
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Writ Petitions for Habeas Corpus
Outcome
Petitions partially allowed; detention orders for certain petitioners quashed; other petitions dismissed.
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Habeas Corpus, Fundamental Rights, Public Order, Vagueness of Detention Grounds
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Preventive Detention Habeas Corpus Fundamental Rights Public Order Vagueness of Detention Grounds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Pushkar Mukherjee & Ors.

Petitioner

The State of West Bengal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Writ Petitions for Habeas Corpus

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether preventive detention under s. 3(1) of the Preventive Detention Act can be sustained when grounds relate to assault on solitary individuals rather than affecting public order
  2. 2 Whether an order of detention is invalid if any supplied ground is irrelevant or vague
  3. 3 Interpretation of 'public order' under s. 3(1) of the Preventive Detention Act

Ratio Decidendi

Detention orders based on grounds relating only to assaults on solitary individuals or vague grounds not connected with public order are illegal and ultra vires. The constitutional safeguard against vagueness must be satisfied for each ground supplied; if any ground is vague or irrelevant, the detention is invalid.

Court Disposition

Petitions partially allowed; detention orders for certain petitioners quashed; other petitions dismissed.

Orders

  • Petitioners whose grounds of detention were held irrelevant or vague are entitled to be set at liberty forthwith.
  • Petitions for other detenus dismissed as no illegality found in their detention.