NEEL & NIRENJAN MAJUMDAR versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The 1923 notification prohibiting the possession and carrying of arms other than firearms without license, originally issued under section 15 of the Arms Act, 1878, continued to remain in force and is deemed to have been issued under section 4 of the Arms Act, 1959 by virtue of sections 6 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, as the 1959 Act contains no contrary intention and re-enacts similar provisions. Therefore, possession and carrying of a sword without license is an offence under the Arms Act, 1959 and ground no. 2 of the detention order is not extraneous.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Neel & Niranjan Majumdar; Respondent: The State of West Bengal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for Habeas Corpus / Supreme Court Decision on Merits
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, Continuity of Notifications After Statutory Repeal, Interpretation of Statutes, Arms Act Offences, General Clauses Act Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neel & Niranjan Majumdar
Petitioner
The State of West Bengal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for Habeas Corpus / Supreme Court Decision on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notification of 1923 issued under section 15 of the Arms Act, 1878 continued after its repeal by the Arms Act, 1959 and applied to offences alleged to have been committed after 1959.
- 2 Whether possession and carrying of a sword without a license, as alleged in the grounds of detention, falls within offences under the Arms Act, 1959 and thereby justifies preventive detention under s. 3(2)(d) of the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970.
Ratio Decidendi
The 1923 notification prohibiting the possession and carrying of arms other than firearms without license, originally issued under section 15 of the Arms Act, 1878, continued to remain in force and is deemed to have been issued under section 4 of the Arms Act, 1959 by virtue of sections 6 and 24 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, as the 1959 Act contains no contrary intention and re-enacts similar provisions. Therefore, possession and carrying of a sword without license is an offence under the Arms Act, 1959 and ground no. 2 of the detention order is not extraneous.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- The writ petition fails and is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment