TIRUMALA TIRUPATL DEVASTHANAMS versus K. JOTHEESWARA PILLAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.
There is no statutory provision or rule permitting exemption from age eligibility under Rule 11; previous concessions do not create a right; appointment of respondents was illegal and writ of mandamus cannot issue to direct exemption.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams; Respondents: K. Jotheeswara Pillai (D) by LRs. and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Division Bench Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court Affirming Single Judge's Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Employment, Eligibility Criteria, Age Limits, Discrimination, Relaxation of Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams
Appellant
K. Jotheeswara Pillai (D) by LRs. and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against Division Bench Judgment of Andhra Pradesh High Court Affirming Single Judge's Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exemption from age criterion can be granted to employees appointed under a circular favouring ex-employees
- 2 Whether previous exemptions create a right to exemption from age
- 3 Whether writ of mandamus can be issued to direct employer to grant such exemption
Ratio Decidendi
There is no statutory provision or rule permitting exemption from age eligibility under Rule 11; previous concessions do not create a right; appointment of respondents was illegal and writ of mandamus cannot issue to direct exemption.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgments of High Court (Single Judge and Division Bench) set aside
- Writ petition by respondents dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment