LAXMI NARAIN MEHAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

LAXMI NARAIN MEHAR versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

The transfer order is not arbitrary since it was made due to administrative exigency and need for experienced staff. Instructions for retention near home town are subject to administrative needs, and authority retains power to transfer when necessary.

Parties
Petitioner: Laxmi Narain Mehar; Respondents: Union of India and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 February 1997
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (c) Nos. 3433 34 of 1997 / Decision on Special Leave Petition
Outcome
petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Transfer of Government Officers, Scheduled Caste Posting Policy, Compassionate Grounds, Administrative Exigency
Service Law Transfer of Government Officers Scheduled Caste Posting Policy Compassionate Grounds Administrative Exigency

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laxmi Narain Mehar

Petitioner

Union of India and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (c) Nos. 3433 34 of 1997 / Decision on Special Leave Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether transfer order of Scheduled Caste officer on administrative grounds is arbitrary
  2. 2 Whether retention instructions for Scheduled Caste officer near home town override administrative exigency
  3. 3 Whether transfer was punitive in nature because of allegations made by petitioner

Ratio Decidendi

The transfer order is not arbitrary since it was made due to administrative exigency and need for experienced staff. Instructions for retention near home town are subject to administrative needs, and authority retains power to transfer when necessary.

Court Disposition

petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Petitioner may make a representation before the appropriate authority; authority may consider it on merits.