U.O.I. AND ORS. versus BASHIR AHMED

U.O.I. AND ORS. versus BASHIR AHMED

Respondent did not complete the requisite period of service as prescribed under Army Instructions and Regulations for the Army, 1962, hence not entitled to pension.

Parties
Appellant: U.0.1. AND ORS.; Respondent: Bashir Ahmed
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeals allowed
Legal Topics
Pension Entitlement, Requisite Period of Service, Army Pension Regulations
Service Law Pension Entitlement Requisite Period of Service Army Pension Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

U.0.1. AND ORS.

Appellant

Bashir Ahmed

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Is the respondent entitled to pension despite not completing the requisite period of service as prescribed by Army Regulations?

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent did not complete the requisite period of service as prescribed under Army Instructions and Regulations for the Army, 1962, hence not entitled to pension.

Court Disposition

appeals allowed

Orders

  • Orders of the learned Single Judge and Division Bench are set aside.
  • The writ petition is dismissed.