UJJAIN VIKAS PRADHIKARAN, (UJJAIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) versus TARACHAND AND ANR. ETC.
Where the claimants in their memorandum of appeal restrict their claim to a specific amount, the court cannot award compensation in excess of that amount; the High Court erred in awarding Rs. 26,125 per bigha when claimants had confined their claim to Rs. 20,000 per bigha.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ujjain Vikas Pradhikaran (Ujjain Development Authority); Respondent: Tarachand; Respondent: Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals From High Court
- Outcome
- Appellant's appeal allowed to extent of reducing compensation, claimants' appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Enhancement, Power of Court, Limitation on Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ujjain Vikas Pradhikaran (Ujjain Development Authority)
Appellant
Tarachand
Respondent
Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeals From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in awarding compensation in excess of the amount claimed by the landowners
- 2 Whether claimants are entitled to compensation higher than the amount stated in their memorandum of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Where the claimants in their memorandum of appeal restrict their claim to a specific amount, the court cannot award compensation in excess of that amount; the High Court erred in awarding Rs. 26,125 per bigha when claimants had confined their claim to Rs. 20,000 per bigha.
Court Disposition
Appellant's appeal allowed to extent of reducing compensation, claimants' appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Claimants are entitled to compensation at Rs. 20,000 per bigha with solatium and interest as awarded by the High Court
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment