UNIFLEX CABLES LTD. versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-II

UNIFLEX CABLES LTD. versus COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, SURAT-II

The exemption under Notification No. 205/88-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 57/95 does not apply to insulated electrical cables supplied by the appellant for use in wind mills, as decided in Nicco Corporation Ltd.; penalty is not justified as the issue was interpretational and there was no evidence of deliberate wrongdoing.

Parties
Appellant: Uniflex Cables Ltd.; Respondent: Commissioner, Central Excise, Surat-II
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed
Legal Topics
Exemption Notification, Interpretation of Notification, Imposition of Penalty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Uniflex Cables Ltd.

Appellant

Commissioner, Central Excise, Surat-II

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Eligibility of insulated electrical cables for exemption under Notification No. 205/88-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 57/95
  2. 2 Justification of penalty imposition under Rule 173Q(1) given facts and circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The exemption under Notification No. 205/88-C.E. as amended by Notification No. 57/95 does not apply to insulated electrical cables supplied by the appellant for use in wind mills, as decided in Nicco Corporation Ltd.; penalty is not justified as the issue was interpretational and there was no evidence of deliberate wrongdoing.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed

Orders

  • Order of Commissioner imposing penalty and Tribunal's confirmation of penalty quashed
  • Appeal allowed to extent penalty is set aside; parties to bear their own costs