S.K. MUKHERJEE versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

S.K. MUKHERJEE versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The service conditions regarding pay, leave, and benefits for appointments under the Civil Defence Corps may be prescribed by the State Government under Regulation 8 of the Civil Defence Regulations, 1968. The petitioner's contrary claim is misconceived. There was no discrimination violative of Article 14 due to the Central Government's action relating to MCEF employees.

Parties
Petitioner: S.K. Mukherjee; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: State of West Bengal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 August 1994
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Civil Defence Act, Civil Defence Regulations, Service Conditions, Discrimination, Administrative Law
Service Law Civil Defence Act Civil Defence Regulations Service Conditions Discrimination Administrative Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S.K. Mukherjee

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

State of West Bengal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether service conditions of Civil Defence Corps members can only be stipulated by the Central Government under the Civil Defence Act, 1968
  2. 2 Whether there has been discrimination violative of Article 14 of the Constitution due to differential service conditions

Ratio Decidendi

The service conditions regarding pay, leave, and benefits for appointments under the Civil Defence Corps may be prescribed by the State Government under Regulation 8 of the Civil Defence Regulations, 1968. The petitioner's contrary claim is misconceived. There was no discrimination violative of Article 14 due to the Central Government's action relating to MCEF employees.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petitioner not entitled to either relief sought
  • Rule discharged