UNION OF INDIA versus SHREE SHANKAR TEXTILES EX-EMPLOYEES UNION AND ORS.
The High Court erred in holding the Scheme conditions relating to Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as unconstitutional and arbitrary without adequate reasoning; factual closure date before the relevant date disentitled workers from benefits under the scheme; orders of High Court are set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Union of India; Respondent No. 1: Shree Shankar Textiles Ex-Employees Union
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Orders of Single Judge and Division Bench of High Court set aside. Writ application dismissed. No order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Closure of Textile Mills, Textile Workers Rehabilitation Fund Scheme, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Discrimination Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Union of India
Appellant
Shree Shankar Textiles Ex-Employees Union
Respondent No. 1
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the eligibility conditions under the Textile Workers Rehabilitation Fund Scheme, specifically closure under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, are unconstitutional, discriminatory, or arbitrary
- 2 Whether the factual date of closure entitles workers to benefits under the Scheme
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court erred in holding the Scheme conditions relating to Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as unconstitutional and arbitrary without adequate reasoning; factual closure date before the relevant date disentitled workers from benefits under the scheme; orders of High Court are set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Orders of Single Judge and Division Bench of High Court set aside. Writ application dismissed. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The orders of the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench are set aside.
- The writ application filed by the respondent No.1 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment