PRAFULL GORADIA versus UNION OF INDIA

PRAFULL GORADIA versus UNION OF INDIA

The Haj Committee Act, 2002 does not violate Article 27, as there is no evidence that a substantial part of tax proceeds is utilized for promotion or maintenance of a particular religion. Facilities and expenditures are also provided for other religious pilgrimages, so there is no violation of Articles 14 or 15, and no discrimination. Petitioner's allegation is vague and unsupported by specifics.

Parties
Petitioner: Prafull Goradia; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Order of Supreme Court
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Constitutional Validity, Religious Subsidies, Secularism, Equality Before Law
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Constitutional Validity Religious Subsidies Secularism Equality Before Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Prafull Goradia

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Final Order of Supreme Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Haj Committee Act, 2002 violates Articles 14, 15, and 27 of the Constitution by utilizing tax proceeds to subsidize a religious pilgrimage.

Ratio Decidendi

The Haj Committee Act, 2002 does not violate Article 27, as there is no evidence that a substantial part of tax proceeds is utilized for promotion or maintenance of a particular religion. Facilities and expenditures are also provided for other religious pilgrimages, so there is no violation of Articles 14 or 15, and no discrimination. Petitioner's allegation is vague and unsupported by specifics.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petition dismissed; no violation found under Articles 14, 15, or 27 of the Constitution.