LAXMANAPPA HANUMANTAPPA JAMKHANDI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

LAXMANAPPA HANUMANTAPPA JAMKHANDI versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

In view of the specific ruling in Ramjilal v. Income-tax Officer, Mohindergarh, Article 31(1) does not cover deprivation of property by taxation, and the right under Article 265 cannot be enforced by Article 32 petition. The petition under Article 32 is not maintainable for challenging tax assessments or recovery pursuant to lawful tax legislation.

Parties
Petitioner: Laxmanappa Hanumantappa Jamkhandi; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 October 1954
Procedural Posture
Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution / Judgment on Maintainability and Merits
Outcome
Petition dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights, Powers Under Article 32, Tax Recovery, Taxation on Income (investigation Commission) Act, 1947, Retrospective Application of Taxation Laws
Constitutional Law Taxation Law Enforcement of Fundamental Rights Powers Under Article 32 Tax Recovery Taxation on Income (investigation Commission) Act, 1947 Retrospective Application of Taxation Laws

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laxmanappa Hanumantappa Jamkhandi

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution / Judgment on Maintainability and Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether proceedings under the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947 after the Constitution came into force contravene Articles 14 and 20(3)
  2. 2 Whether assessment orders made in pursuance of Investigation Commission proceedings violate petitioner's rights under Articles 31(1) and 19(1)(f)
  3. 3 Whether Article 265 confers a fundamental right enforceable under Article 32

Ratio Decidendi

In view of the specific ruling in Ramjilal v. Income-tax Officer, Mohindergarh, Article 31(1) does not cover deprivation of property by taxation, and the right under Article 265 cannot be enforced by Article 32 petition. The petition under Article 32 is not maintainable for challenging tax assessments or recovery pursuant to lawful tax legislation.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Petition under Article 32 dismissed
  • Costs awarded against petitioner