M/S. BHIKUSE YAMASA KSHATRIYA (P) LTD., & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
Section 85 of the Factories Act and the notification issued under it are constitutionally valid; they are neither discriminatory nor do they impose unreasonable restrictions on the fundamental rights of the petitioners. Deemed workers are entitled to the statutory benefits if they meet the prescribed working conditions.
- Parties
- Petitioner: M/s. Bhikuse Yamasa Kshatriya (P) Ltd.; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Another
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction – Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Factories Act – Application to Deemed Workers, Constitution of India – Articles 14 and 19(1)(g), Discrimination, Reasonable Restriction on Trade, State Notifications Under Statutory Power
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/s. Bhikuse Yamasa Kshatriya (P) Ltd.
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction – Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 85 of the Factories Act, 1948 and the notification issued thereunder violate the petitioners' fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the notification is discriminatory in selecting certain establishments for application of the Act.
- 3 Whether obligations imposed on deemed workers amount to unreasonable restriction on business.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 85 of the Factories Act and the notification issued under it are constitutionally valid; they are neither discriminatory nor do they impose unreasonable restrictions on the fundamental rights of the petitioners. Deemed workers are entitled to the statutory benefits if they meet the prescribed working conditions.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition is dismissed with costs, two sets, one hearing fee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment