MS. NEELU ARORA AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
There is no scope under the Supreme Court-framed scheme for a third round of counselling for MBBS/BDS admissions under the 15% All-India quota. The scheme should not be treated as a statute nor be endlessly altered to fill remaining vacancies year after year. The object is to achieve broad-based equality of...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Ms. Neelu Arora; Respondent: Union of India
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Final Disposal
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Medical Admission, 15% All India Quota, Mbbs/bds Counselling, Modification of Court Framed Scheme
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms. Neelu Arora
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a third round of counselling should be permitted for vacant 15% All-India quota seats in MBBS/BDS courses after two rounds as per Supreme Court-framed scheme.
Ratio Decidendi
There is no scope under the Supreme Court-framed scheme for a third round of counselling for MBBS/BDS admissions under the 15% All-India quota. The scheme should not be treated as a statute nor be endlessly altered to fill remaining vacancies year after year. The object is to achieve broad-based equality of opportunity, not fill every vacant seat mathematically, and mid-session admissions are contrary to the statutes governing medical education.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed.
Orders
- Interlocutory Applications disposed of in view of the order in the main petition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment