DURGADAS SHIRALI versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

DURGADAS SHIRALI versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

It is open to challenge a detention order for mala fides or irrelevance of grounds, but in this case, the District Magistrate applied his mind to specific activities based on reports, and the petitioner’s political association was a relevant consideration under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules.

Parties
Petitioner: Durgadas Shirali; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Narayan Das Mehta, District Magistrate of Bhilwara
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 November 1965
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Fundamental Rights, Emergency Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Durgadas Shirali

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Narayan Das Mehta, District Magistrate of Bhilwara

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the order of detention passed under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962 is mala fide or unsupported by relevant materials
  2. 2 Whether membership of a political party not declared illegal can be a relevant ground for detention

Ratio Decidendi

It is open to challenge a detention order for mala fides or irrelevance of grounds, but in this case, the District Magistrate applied his mind to specific activities based on reports, and the petitioner’s political association was a relevant consideration under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Writ Petition under Article 32 dismissed
  • No release from detention granted