DURGADAS SHIRALI versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
It is open to challenge a detention order for mala fides or irrelevance of grounds, but in this case, the District Magistrate applied his mind to specific activities based on reports, and the petitioner’s political association was a relevant consideration under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Durgadas Shirali; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Narayan Das Mehta, District Magistrate of Bhilwara
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Preventive Detention, Fundamental Rights, Emergency Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Durgadas Shirali
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Narayan Das Mehta, District Magistrate of Bhilwara
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order of detention passed under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962 is mala fide or unsupported by relevant materials
- 2 Whether membership of a political party not declared illegal can be a relevant ground for detention
Ratio Decidendi
It is open to challenge a detention order for mala fides or irrelevance of grounds, but in this case, the District Magistrate applied his mind to specific activities based on reports, and the petitioner’s political association was a relevant consideration under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Writ Petition under Article 32 dismissed
- No release from detention granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment