DAVID PATRICK WARD AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

DAVID PATRICK WARD AND ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

A solitary act can form the basis for preventive detention if the circumstances indicate a likelihood of future similar acts; the grounds were not vague, petitioners were properly served, representation need not be considered when writ is filed; authorities' security-based decision on place of detention and refusal of deportation is not subject to judicial review unless rights are denied; consular access must be facilitated, but security prevails over jail location.

Parties
Petitioner: David Patrick Ward; Petitioner: Steven Hillman; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh; Respondent: State of Nagaland
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 August 1992
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) / Original Jurisdiction, Final Judgment
Outcome
Petitions dismissed.
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Service of Detention Orders, Vagueness of Grounds, Solitary Act as Basis for Detention, Consideration of Representation, Deportation Vs Detention, Consular Access
Constitutional Law Criminal Law National Security Law International Law Preventive Detention Service of Detention Orders Vagueness of Grounds Solitary Act as Basis for Detention +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Patrick Ward

Petitioner

Steven Hillman

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

State of Uttar Pradesh

Respondent

State of Nagaland

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (criminal) / Original Jurisdiction, Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether detention under National Security Act, 1980 based on a solitary act is valid.
  2. 2 Whether the grounds of detention were vague or ambiguous.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners were properly served with detention orders and grounds of detention.

Ratio Decidendi

A solitary act can form the basis for preventive detention if the circumstances indicate a likelihood of future similar acts; the grounds were not vague, petitioners were properly served, representation need not be considered when writ is filed; authorities' security-based decision on place of detention and refusal of deportation is not subject to judicial review unless rights are denied; consular access must be facilitated, but security prevails over jail location.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed.

Orders

  • Detention orders confirmed as valid.
  • Petitioners to remain in Naini Jail, Allahabad.