SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA ETC.

SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA ETC.

The Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 imposes a reasonable restriction on the right to trade in prize chits to protect the public from exploitation; the classification between conventional and prize chits is justified; statutory exemptions are reasonable; and Parliament was competent to legislate. No ground is made out for striking down the Act under Articles 14 or 19(1)(g).

Parties
Petitioner: SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS.; Respondent: UNION OF INDIA; Respondent: State of Bombay; Intervener: Intervener in WP No. 711/79; Respondent: Respondent No. 3 in WP No. 1152/79
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
24 September 1980
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
Writ Petitions Dismissed
Legal Topics
Prize Chits, Money Circulation Schemes, Reasonableness of Restrictions on Fundamental Rights, Reasonable Classification Under Article 14, Legislative Competence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES & ORS.

Petitioner

UNION OF INDIA

Respondent

State of Bombay

Respondent

Intervener in WP No. 711/79

Intervener

Respondent No. 3 in WP No. 1152/79

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 is unconstitutional for being an unreasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g)
  2. 2 Whether prohibition of prize chits but not conventional chits amounts to discrimination under Article 14
  3. 3 Whether the exemptions under Section 11 are discriminatory

Ratio Decidendi

The Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 imposes a reasonable restriction on the right to trade in prize chits to protect the public from exploitation; the classification between conventional and prize chits is justified; statutory exemptions are reasonable; and Parliament was competent to legislate. No ground is made out for striking down the Act under Articles 14 or 19(1)(g).

Court Disposition

Writ Petitions Dismissed

Orders

  • All writ petitions are dismissed; parties to bear their own costs.