RAMLAL versus UNION OF INDIA

RAMLAL versus UNION OF INDIA

A person appointed on an ad hoc basis as a casual worker and subsequently reinstated after termination, but who was not originally subject to the regular selection process and medical examination, is not entitled to the status and service benefits of a regular employee from the date of first appointment. His...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: Ramlal; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
21 August 1996
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Order
Outcome
Petition dismissed.
Legal Topics
Railway Service, Ad Hoc Appointment, Casual Worker, Reinstatement, Regularization, Pensionary Benefits
Service Law Railway Service Ad Hoc Appointment Casual Worker Reinstatement Regularization Pensionary Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ramlal

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to the status and benefits of a regular employee from the initial date of appointment
  2. 2 Effect of not undergoing medical test and selection process for regularization
  3. 3 Applicability of Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Shanna v. State of U.P.

Ratio Decidendi

A person appointed on an ad hoc basis as a casual worker and subsequently reinstated after termination, but who was not originally subject to the regular selection process and medical examination, is not entitled to the status and service benefits of a regular employee from the date of first appointment. His regularization and benefits are effective from the date he fulfills the requisite conditions, but his temporary service qualifies for pensionary benefits.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed.

Orders

  • Petitioner entitled to pensionary benefits for qualifying temporary service.