SHRI DINESH TRIVEDI, M.P. AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

SHRI DINESH TRIVEDI, M.P. AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

The Vohra Committee Report tabled in Parliament is genuine, authentic, and unabridged; full-scale disclosure of supporting materials, annexures, or sensitive information is denied as it would be severely injurious to public interest, security, and confidentiality. The constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 need not be examined. Instead, to address the issues concerning nexus between politicians, bureaucrats, and criminals, the creation of a high-level committee or an all-powerful independent body (such as an Ombudsman or Lokpal) is recommended to monitor investigations.

Parties
Petitioner: SHRI DINESH TRIVEDI, M.P.; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 March 1997
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (c) No. 664 of 1995 (under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) / Final Disposal at Supreme Court, Judgment Delivered
Outcome
Writ petition dismissed. Petition disposed of.
Legal Topics
Right to Information, Official Secrets Act, Public Interest Litigation, Government Accountability, Crime and Corruption, Role of Intelligence Agencies
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Criminal Law Right to Information Official Secrets Act Public Interest Litigation Government Accountability Crime and Corruption +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SHRI DINESH TRIVEDI, M.P.

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (c) No. 664 of 1995 (under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) / Final Disposal at Supreme Court, Judgment Delivered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Vohra Committee Report tabled in Parliament is authentic and complete.
  2. 2 Whether supporting materials and annexures to the Vohra Committee Report should be publicly disclosed, overriding public interest and secrecy.
  3. 3 Whether Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 is unconstitutional and unreasonable.

Ratio Decidendi

The Vohra Committee Report tabled in Parliament is genuine, authentic, and unabridged; full-scale disclosure of supporting materials, annexures, or sensitive information is denied as it would be severely injurious to public interest, security, and confidentiality. The constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 need not be examined. Instead, to address the issues concerning nexus between politicians, bureaucrats, and criminals, the creation of a high-level committee or an all-powerful independent body (such as an Ombudsman or Lokpal) is recommended to monitor investigations.

Court Disposition

Writ petition dismissed. Petition disposed of.

Orders

  • No direction for full-scale disclosure of supporting materials to the public.
  • No adjudication on the constitutional validity of Section 5 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.