VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF PUNJAB versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF PUNJAB versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Widespread discrimination against female child persists due to social factors and misuse of pre-natal diagnostic techniques. The statutory framework is not adequately implemented by the competent authorities, Boards, and Committees. Supreme Court directs extensive steps to ensure supervision, enforcement, record maintenance, prosecution, awareness, and monitoring under the Act and Rules.

Parties
Petitioner: Voluntary Health Association of Punjab; Respondent: Union of India
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Order on Directions, Further Listing for Status Report
Outcome
Matter adjourned; directions issued for enforcement and compliance; States to file status report within three months.
Legal Topics
Sex Selective Abortion, Female Foeticide, Implementation of Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques (prohibition on Sex Selection) Act, 1994, Discrimination Against Girl Child, Dowry System, Awareness and Enforcement of Statutory Mandates

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Voluntary Health Association of Punjab

Petitioner

Union of India

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (civil) / Order on Directions, Further Listing for Status Report

  1. 1 Whether the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition on Sex-Selection) Act, 1994 and Rules, 1996 are being effectively implemented by States and Union Territories.
  2. 2 What steps are required for supervision, prosecution, and awareness to prevent sex-selective abortion and discrimination against female child.

Ratio Decidendi

Widespread discrimination against female child persists due to social factors and misuse of pre-natal diagnostic techniques. The statutory framework is not adequately implemented by the competent authorities, Boards, and Committees. Supreme Court directs extensive steps to ensure supervision, enforcement, record maintenance, prosecution, awareness, and monitoring under the Act and Rules.

Court Disposition

Matter adjourned; directions issued for enforcement and compliance; States to file status report within three months.

Orders

  • Central Supervisory Board and State/UT Supervisory Boards to meet every six months to oversee implementation.
  • State Advisory Committees and District Advisory Committees to gather information on breaches, seize records and machines, institute legal proceedings.