R.L. GUPTA & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Supersession of a judicial officer on deputation without valid rules or good reason is unjust; petitioner is entitled to seniority above juniors placed on probation during his deputation and should be deemed to have been on probation from the relevant date.
- Parties
- Petitioner: R.L. Gupta; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Delhi High Court
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 619 of 1987 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Merits
- Outcome
- Petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Supersession, Seniority, Deputation, Probation, Judicial Officers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R.L. Gupta
Petitioner
Union of India
Respondent
Delhi High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 619 of 1987 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Decision on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the supersession of a judicial officer on deputation by junior officers placed on probation is valid
- 2 Whether seniority can be denied due to deputation in public interest
Ratio Decidendi
Supersession of a judicial officer on deputation without valid rules or good reason is unjust; petitioner is entitled to seniority above juniors placed on probation during his deputation and should be deemed to have been on probation from the relevant date.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed
Orders
- Petitioner R.L. Gupta to be deemed on probation from 22.11.1985 and his services regulated accordingly.
- Petitioner to be deemed senior to Shri Jaspal Singh in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment