BRIJ MOHAN LAL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Speedy justice is a constitutional obligation of the State under Article 21. The Fast Track Courts Scheme, having been operationalised, should not be discontinued abruptly, and the States cannot abdicate their responsibility due to financial constraints. The Union and States should treat the administration and funding of Fast Track Courts as a joint venture.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Brij Mohan Lal; Respondent: Union of India and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Transferred Case (civil) No. 22 of 2001 / Interim Order
- Outcome
- Interim directions issued pending final disposal of writ petition; Scheme to continue for one month.
- Legal Topics
- Fast Track Courts Scheme, Speedy Justice, Allocation of Funds for Judiciary, Joint Venture Between Union and States
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brij Mohan Lal
Petitioner
Union of India and Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Transferred Case (civil) No. 22 of 2001 / Interim Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Fast Track Courts Scheme should continue beyond 31.3.2005
- 2 Whether the State can deny its obligation to provide speedy justice due to financial constraints
Ratio Decidendi
Speedy justice is a constitutional obligation of the State under Article 21. The Fast Track Courts Scheme, having been operationalised, should not be discontinued abruptly, and the States cannot abdicate their responsibility due to financial constraints. The Union and States should treat the administration and funding of Fast Track Courts as a joint venture.
Court Disposition
Interim directions issued pending final disposal of writ petition; Scheme to continue for one month.
Orders
- Union of India directed to continue the Fast Track Courts Scheme for one month pending hearing and disposal of Writ Petition (C) No. 140 of 2005 and related cases.
- Unspent amount of Rs. 82.87 crores lying with the Central Government shall not lapse on 31.3.2005; disbursement for Fast Track Courts shall continue as before.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment